darvinasafo:

I see no lies.

darvinasafo:

I see no lies.

(via lejacquelope)

Tags: economics

peachy-quinoa:

I would like to sit down an anti feminist and go through one of their painfully long uneducated rants about why you shouldn’t support feminism, and highlight everything they say that is an incorrect or an ignorant assumption that they bothered to make so they sound like they know what they’re talking about

Okay, explain how feminists can be intellectually honest in saying they fight for men when at least two chapters of the National Organization for Women have fought against default custody being split between both parents, when it’s supposed to be the patriarchy that says women take care of kids and Dads are the ones who can’t parent and will abuse their kids despite the majority of abuse being perpetrated by the mother? Related links: https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/20980-as-it-was-and-ever-shall-be-now-opposes-equal-rights-for-fathers http://www.deltabravo.net/cms/plugins/content/content.php?content.230 http://www.seattlepi.com/local/opinion/article/NOW-seems-stuck-in-yesterday-1211756.php http://www.rxpgnews.com/india/Mothers-abuse-children-more-than-fathers-report_printer.shtml http://www.psychpage.com/learning/library/counseling/childvio.html

Anonymous said: I ship you with hellnoradfems

cynicssong:

Awesome, after checking them out, they definitely gained a new follower.

Hi friend. I’m not sure who you are, but I guess you must be a pretty cool chick if this Anon ships us.

mr-cappadocia:

hypnictwitch:

nextyearsgirl:

Just MRA Things: caring more about a child’s right not to be “denied a parent” than a woman’s right not to be legally forced to interact with her rapist.

How dare you deny a child their god-given right to spend time with a rapist

Strangely. .. you seem to support it when the rapist is female. Oh, wait, you must be one of those males can’t be raped feminists. My bad.

mr-cappadocia, why do you bother replying to absurd straw man arguments? Like, it’s about as pointless as trying to educate a young earth creationist about evolution.

(via attack-on-stupid)

thespectacularspider-girl:

grls-vomit-candy:

colorsofsocialjustice:

This is Rebecca Brink’s response to Women Again Feminism. 

This is not smart, funny, cute, or make you a supporter of women. Many anti-feminists are rape and sexual assault survivors. Telling them they don’t know what it’s like or saying they don’t care about rape victims is a huge f-you to them. Telling non-feminist women they deserve to be raped and sexually harassed or say their abuse drove them not to support feminism is an even bigger f-you. You know the real reason why people distrust feminists? Because extremists like this only care about the inner circle. These people claim to fight against misogyny, but become ironically misogynistic to women with different opinions. If you don’t agree with Women Against Feminism, fine, that’s your right. But this crosses the line. It’s no excuse to act this way. It’s disgusting and immature and no dictionary or “that’s not real feminism” isn’t going to change that. People are praising this and calling these women heroes for being gross and patronizing to non-feminist women and it’s not funny. 

-Indigo (who’s disappointed) 

There are female “anti-feminist” rape/abuse survivors that don’t call themselves feminist because they were sick of the feminists who think only men can be rapists.

God fuckings damn these pieces of fucking shit.  This is why I don’t ned feminism.  Holy fucking shit.

so many of us are fucking rape survivors.  How the fuck can these people pull this shit with any shred of decency left in them?  Thjey are garbage.

Rape culture is wishing rape on someone for disagreeing with you on the relevance of feminism in 21st century America.

thebitterfrenchcanadian:

I have been drunk four nights in a row

same, at least 4 nights in a row for me too.

attack-on-stupid:

swimmingferret:

attack-on-stupid:

swimmingferret:

attack-on-stupid:

swimmingferret:

attack-on-stupid:

swimmingferret:

attack-on-stupid:

swimmingferret:

attack-on-stupid:

swimmingferret:

Some of my favourite posts on twitter pointing out the ridiculousness of the #WomenAgainstFeminism tag.

friendly reminder that women =/= feminism

god forbid women have opinions that differ from your hivemind!

I see an ignorant little shit decided to comment on my post!

Tell me, do you legitimately think women world-wide have it good? Those Women Against Feminism are just over-privileged fuckheads who are willfully ignorant to the horrific shit women world wide are subjected to due to patriarchy and misogyny, mainly because they are internalised  Misogynists who give ZERO shits about all the women who still suffer from sexism, discrimination and routinely get harassed/stalked/raped/trafficked/abused and killed. They think “It never happened to ME so clearly it’s fake/made up! So I don’t give a shit!”

Get your ignorant ass the fuck away from my blog.

hey! friendly fucking reminder that feminism isn’t only ideology/movement that pushed and advocates for women’s rights WORLDWIDE. not to mention feminists don’t do jack shit for women outside of first world countries.

there are far less corrupt groups than yours that advocate women’s rights, so stop thinking that it’s your way or no way, asshole.

Ya know, for someone who claims they are for ‘equality’ on their blog you’re doing a real good impression of an MRA.

damn, someone disagrees with “MRA MUST BE MRA!!!”. i might need to inform you that I’m against the MRM for the same reasons I’m against feminism (well most reasons)

you ignored that I pointed out that you called me a “#stupid little cunt” (still loving your vapid misogyny)

So? You’re acting like a stupid little cunt so I called you one.

So I should add anti-feminist to the list as well? Aren’t you a bowl of sunshine and sexism. Let me guess, you believe misandry is real?

you say cunt, I’m the sexist? top lel

Lmao I don’t live in the US- cunt isn’t a gendered slur where I live. Try again, douchenozzle but try not to ignore all the questions I just asked.

i didn’t think you’d want a response, seeing as you ignored the wall of text above haha

anti-feminist? no, too much shit flying around in the community… same as feminism and MRM. egalitarianism has a pretty clean community that takes care of the vapid ones and prevents radicalism, unlike a couple other movements (i.e. feminism)

believe in misandry? well, when men are incarcerated at almost 33 times more than women? when feminists fight their hardest to keep men from being included in the legal definition of rape? when feminists threaten to kill a woman (killed her dog) for revealing statistics that showed than men were abused at equal or higher rates than women? when it’s been proven that men (US) are 50% (58% with prison rape) of rape victims (source: CDC 2010; NCVS 2012) but feminists try to cover up the statistics and claim that it’s really 1 in 87 (source: 1978 survey; rigged)? when they instituted the Duluth model and VAWA to ensure no matter what the (heterosexual) domestic violence situation was, the female was always the presumed victim?

well, I don’t know what I’d say to that


(I’ll just wait for you to pass the blame over to “TEH PATRIARCHY!!1!”)

Gimme sources, or you’re just talking outta your ass. :|

gave you sources. CDC sexual crimes report 2010 and NCVS 2012, incase you forgot.

Friendly reminder that lesbian women face equal to higher rates of domestic violence than do their heterosexual counterparts, yet since they’re abused by women they don’t get counted. But since men aren’t performing this oppressive act, who cares, right? It’s just female on female violence so it’s not important. Or, that’s the logic for male on male violence at least. https://www.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianhealth/a/DVFactsMyths.htm
cheshireinthemiddle:

theanticlimactic:

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/04/male_rape_in_america_a_new_study_reveals_that_men_are_sexually_assaulted.html#comments"For years, the FBI defined forcible rape, for data collecting purposes, as “the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.” Eventually localities began to rebel against that limited gender-bound definition; in 2010 Chicago reported 86,767 cases of rape but used its own broader definition, so the FBI left out the Chicago stats. Finally, in 2012, the FBI revised its definition and focused on penetration, with no mention of female (or force). Data hasn’t been calculated under the new FBI definition yet"tp://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/09/living/chris-brown-female-on-male-rape/?c=&page=3"The study also found that males and females carried out sexual violence at strikingly similar rates after the age of 18 — 52% of males and 48% of females. The study classified sexual violence into a few categories: foresexual or presexual contact"1. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/2. http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3?op=13. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/opinion/22Sommers.html?_r=1&hpmore-than-men-in-uk/Wage gap is a myth too
This “info” graphic is just full of misinformation and anyone who believes this without actual research is sad excuse for a human being. Anyone who mocks the idea of wanting to talk about male rape (an issue that obviously under discussed) because they think it’s less of an issue than female rape YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

Truth often lags behind what is fun to beleive

 These are Australian statistics, so in this case the FBI data is irrelevant. Anyone know how rape is defined in Australia?

cheshireinthemiddle:

theanticlimactic:

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/04/male_rape_in_america_a_new_study_reveals_that_men_are_sexually_assaulted.html#comments
"For years, the FBI defined forcible rape, for data collecting purposes, as “the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.” Eventually localities began to rebel against that limited gender-bound definition; in 2010 Chicago reported 86,767 cases of rape but used its own broader definition, so the FBI left out the Chicago stats. Finally, in 2012, the FBI revised its definition and focused on penetration, with no mention of female (or force). Data hasn’t been calculated under the new FBI definition yet"
tp://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/09/living/chris-brown-female-on-male-rape/?c=&page=3
"The study also found that males and females carried out sexual violence at strikingly similar rates after the age of 18 — 52% of males and 48% of females. The study classified sexual violence into a few categories: foresexual or presexual contact"
1. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/
2. http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3?op=1
3. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/opinion/22Sommers.html?_r=1&hp
more-than-men-in-uk/
Wage gap is a myth too

This “info” graphic is just full of misinformation and anyone who believes this without actual research is sad excuse for a human being. Anyone who mocks the idea of wanting to talk about male rape (an issue that obviously under discussed) because they think it’s less of an issue than female rape YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

Truth often lags behind what is fun to beleive

These are Australian statistics, so in this case the FBI data is irrelevant. Anyone know how rape is defined in Australia?

(Source: yoursocialconstructsareshowing, via sjwstupidity)

ace-anonymous:

Yes, all women have stories of how they’ve been victimized by men before

Men also have stories, the only difference is that men aren’t allowed to be victims

(via draumbouy)

feduptoinfinity:

Just today, I’ve seen one feminist call a rape survivor a “privileged asswipe,” a second feminist say that they didn’t believe said rape survivor was raped due to her “not being pretty enough,” and now a third feminist has mocked abuse victims and implied women against feminism are abused into that belief.

Today is a fanfuckingtastic day.